Key findings

• Reviewing of progress should be well-informed, analytical and personalised, with changes in risks, needs and strengths and/or new obstacles to compliance and engagement identified and discussed.
• Reviewing assessments can improve prediction of reoffending by keeping dynamic risk factors up to date, providing an evidence-based mechanism for changes in delivery.
• As with the earlier stages of the ASPIRE process, the service user should be meaningfully involved wherever possible, helping them to take further charge of their own lives.
• Progress and achievements should be recognised and celebrated – one of the principles outlined in the desistance literature.

Background

Reviewing progress towards objectives is another integral part of case supervision, recognising that a service user’s risks, needs, protective factors and circumstances can change over time, and that lapses and relapses are not uncommon, particularly for those involved in persistent offending. Practitioners also need to take account of fresh information and unexpected events.

Importantly, the ASPIRE process is cyclical, with reviewing feeding back into assessment, planning and delivery. The Offender Assessment System (OASys) includes a review plan to facilitate these links.

Summary of the evidence

Well-informed, analytical and personalised reviewing

Reviewing of progress should be well-informed, analytical and personalised. The process should be used to analyse new information (including information from other practitioners and agencies), verify changes in behaviour, adapt or change actions that are completed or no longer appropriate, and re-explore the full range of available resources. Any changes in risks, needs and strengths and/or new obstacles to compliance and engagement should be identified and discussed, with appropriate strategies developed.

Improved predictive validity

To be truly causal, risk factors should be capable of changing (i.e. genuinely dynamic) and should be associated with changes in the likelihood of reoffending when they do change. Research findings from OASys and elsewhere indicate that reviewing assessments can improve prediction of reoffending by keeping dynamic risk factors up to date, providing an evidence-based mechanism for changes in the delivery of services for individual service users.

Engaging the service user

As with the earlier stages of the ASPIRE process, the service user should be meaningfully involved wherever possible, reviewing plans in collaboration, refreshing goals, and developing solutions, helping them to take further charge of their own lives. The process of reviewing provides opportunities to recognise and celebrate progress and any achievements – one of the principles outlined in the desistance literature.

Back to supervision of service usersNext: specific areas of delivery

Back to top